Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in International Journal of Innovation Engineering and Science Research are sent to two or more expert reviewers. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review.
Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review. The review process is double blind. The Editor prepares a decision letter according to the comments of the reviewers, which is sent to the corresponding author.
Lacks proper structure
Lacks the necessary detail for readers to fully understand the authors' analysis
Has no new science
Does not clearly explain which parts of the findings are new science, versus what was already known
Lacks up-to-date references
Contains theories, concepts, or conclusions that are not fully supported by its data, arguments, and information
Does not provide enough details about materials and methods to allow other scientists to repeat the experiment
Lacks clear descriptions or explanations of:
The experimental design
Sample characteristics and descriptive statistics
Describes poor experimental design, or faulty or insufficient statistical analysis
Has poor language quality